Governments believe that economic improvement is the most significant thing to consider. Some people, however, argue that governments have to pay equal attention to other matters. This essay will address both sides of the arguments and provide an opinion as a conclusion.
On the one hand, economic progress has been a goal for many governments in the world since when countries have improved their economic stabilities, other important sectors would eventually make some positive changes. Malaysia, for instance, is a niche example of this phenomenon. In the 1970s the government had to work hard to keep the nation's economy on track and was able to compete in the ASEAN region. These past works of the government bodies then were making some improvements in other sectors such as education and health, and both education quality and the national health status are accounted as the finest among the ASEAN countries. Thus, putting economic stability as the main goal of the nation's development may be the right choice.
However, the opposition of the argument believes that the government should not only prioritize the advance of countries' economies as their main goals. This is mainly because other aspects such as preparing and developing human resources to support the nation's economy are equally significant. If the nation had not had an adequate number of skilled workers to work in the economic sector, the nation's goal to be economically developed would have been unachieved. Take Japan as an example of this case. When Japan started to rebuild the country after the destruction in 1945, the first sector which was targeted to improve by the government was education. After some years, well-educated workers were ready, and Japan commenced to redevelop its economic stability and come back to the global economic market, and finally is becoming an economic power in the world.
To sum up, I believe that both economic stability and other sector are equally important to achieve the nation's goals. Thus, the governments have to pay similar attention to these sectors to ensure that the nation's economic improvement sustains and the nation’s goals are accomplished.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...government had to work hard to keep the nations economy on track and was able to compet...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 702, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...nomic stability as the main goal of the nations development may be the right choice. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...veloping human resources to support the nations economy are equally significant. If the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ers to work in the economic sector, the nations goal to be economically developed would...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 965.302439024 190% => OK
No of words: 349.0 196.424390244 178% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25501432665 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74723693507 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 106.607317073 168% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512893982808 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 584.1 283.868780488 206% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.39981474 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242373606241 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826097369025 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681095612644 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16572005076 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419422948078 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 40.7170731707 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.