The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014.
The map depicts information regarding the transformation of the waterfront area of a town called Darwin from 2009 to 2014. Overall, this area has experienced extensive change, the most noticeable of which is the town was used mainly for residential purposes.
On the eastern side of the area, the main road which was besieged from the western side, and the fishing area at the end of that road were remained unchanged. Besides, the school, convention center, and swimming pool which adjacent to circle road were remained intact in size and position. Moreover, in the circle road, a lake was established in the place that was formerly occupied by an industrial area while the lake and trees were conserved.
On the western side of the area, a footpath stretching from the main road has been constructed providing access to the harbor. Additionally, three new blocks of residential buildings were erected raising the total number of buildings to six while a university building was established. Furthermore, the industrial area was flattened and made way for vegetation whereas a third swimming pool was still located at the same position in 2009.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: intact
...h adjacent to circle road were remained intact in size and position. Moreover, in the circle r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, moreover, regarding, still, third, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10638297872 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84776722718 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56914893617 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 14.2741024236 43.030603864 33% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175698801201 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898994478276 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116957903377 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141466855931 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101880598466 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.