The map show changes between 1960 and now in the Station street.
Massive development of the Station street from 1960 up to now has been depicted in the map.
It can be seen explicitly that tremendous changes have taken place in terms of stores on both sides of the road. Meanwhile Station street has not witnessed any enhancement so far.
From a quick glance at the northern phrase on infrastructure, the shop which once sold fish and chips has been knocked down to make way for a cafe. Alongside, the butcher, toy, book store, bakery and DVD rental store have simultaneously recorded immense demolishment for the accomodation of a supermarket. In addition to this, to the left of the butcher used to lay a pharmacy which has been refunctioned into the parking place.
MOving on to analyse the southern row of facilities, it is evident that the public telephones have been deconstructed to allow for the expansion of the railway station. In close proximity to this, an alteration has been witnessed in the development of the grocery into a hotel. Ultimately, the dry cleaner's situated in the bottom right corner and the Station street allocated in the middle of the map have maintained throughout the depicted period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...ms of stores on both sides of the road. Meanwhile Station street has not witnessed any en...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 172, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...he expansion of the railway station. In close proximity to this, an alteration has been witness...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93846153846 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91587055914 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610256410256 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0873967514 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194729520835 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845626631887 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115372187984 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153860035981 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133887411846 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.