Given maps describe about the enormous changes happened to a particular area from 1965 to present days.
Overall, it can be seen that meadoside, which was a tiny village become established as a suburb with a lot of infrastructural developments over the time frame.
Firstly, in 1965 this area included meadoside village with a small road intersecting through the midline and adjuscently another area called 'Fonton', with a railway line. In 1985 the village road has developed to a high way which bifurcated at the centre of the village and extent ed to Fonton. A housing estate and a super store has been built on either sides of the road. In addition a leasure complex also added to the village on the left side of highway.
In last phase, an exponential growth happened to village to develop as a suburb, obviously plethora of additions and extentions took place. The village joined with Fonton province to become a single part and an additional railway line connecting with the previous line has estabilished with a railway station in the centre of the area. A huge business Park was developed in the southern portion and a hotel on the north side also added to the infrastructure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilway line. In 1985 the village road has developed to a high way which bifurcated...
^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...n built on either sides of the road. In addition a leasure complex also added to the vil...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y line connecting with the previous line has estabilished with a railway station ...
^^
Line 4, column 443, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...otel on the north side also added to the infrastructure.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84729064039 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80767435065 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581280788177 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1636354851 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163079900916 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661931016269 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649620546238 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111891852776 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735904115653 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.