The map shows the development of the Chorleywood village.
Given is the diagram explicating how the neighborhood Chorleywood adjacent to London evolved during the interim starting from 1868 and ending in 1994. It is evident from the information supplied that there were four time frames entailed.
Prior to the actual territory settlement by human beings, the region had been originally paved by two arterial roads direct to the south and the east. From 1868 to 1883, the resident area was situated along the main road to the north, nearby to Chorleywood park and golf course located in the hub. Following 40 years was the expansion of the resident area southward along the main road. Meanwhile, the railroad passage was erected transversely to the main road and crossing the area to the east in 1909. Also located in this area was Chorleywood station.
Furthermore, through a next 50 year span time from 1922 to 1970, the village kept expanding westward and eastward lengthways the railroad. At that time, the motorway was constructed to the north of the village. In the late of 20th century, a colossal acreage around the intersections of the motorway with the railway and one of the main roads was already occupied.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 504, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... crossing the area to the east in 1909. Also located in this area was Chorleywood st...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97948717949 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65567755463 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2154663093 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0651100772785 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0304548938691 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388895840301 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0420484251863 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00479471072627 0.0819641961636 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.