The map shows the development of the Chorleywood village.
Given is a diagram explicating the process of how Chorleywood thorp adjacent to London evolved over an interim starting from 1868 and ending in 1994. It is apparent from the data supplied that there are four principal time frames entailed.
Prior to the actual territory settlement by human beings the region had been originally paved by two main roads directed to the south and east. From 1868 to 1883 people inhabited a small area on the eastern side of the main route to the south, nearby to Chorleywood Park and Golf course located in the center/hub. Following 40 years were marked with further expansion, namely populating a huge region along the main road to the south, and erecting a railroad passage transversely to the main road and crossing the area to the east in 1909.
Furthermore, through next a 50-year time span from 1922 to 1970 the village kept dilating both eastwards and westwards lengthways the railroad. At the very time a motorway was constructed, and by the end of 20 century a colossal acreage around the intersections of the motorway with the railroad and one of the main roads was already occupied.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...y was constructed, and by the end of 20 century a colossal acreage around the intersect...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85492227979 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66430090053 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626943005181 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6478154144 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.857142857 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0329114515214 0.215688989381 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0158562911526 0.103423049105 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0250838238057 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0231539083303 0.15604864568 15% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182719402985 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.