The map shows the plan of a library in 2001 and 2009.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The maps demonstrate the outline of significant changes for a ground floor in a library between 2001 and 2009.
Overall, the maps highlight the drastic developments made for the library from being an old-fashioned to a modernized one. Similarly, various amenities with regard to the book section were increased, along with library development.
In the year 2001, there was a central entrance to enter, and a librarian desk before it, along with stairs in the south-east corner of the book store. Inside the room, square shaped tables were located in the central part, and newspapers and periodicals were adjacent to the furniture. Also, a history and fiction book sections were in the west and north side of the ground floor respectively, in addition to it a self help in the south-west corner.
However, the second map reveals the dramatic alterations made to the study room in 2009, different types of book sections in the west were introduced such as kitchen, economics and law next to self help, history and fiction. Moreover, the space for Newspapers was replaced by Films and DVDs that were adjacent to rectangular tables, where the count was declined compared to original plan. Another spectacular change was the setting up of computer facilities, whereas the main gate, stairs and office desk remained unaltered in 2009. A final interesting development was a certain area confined for children to read the books.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed, along with library development. In the year 2001, there was a central en...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... self help in the south-west corner. However, the second map reveals the dram...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, whereas, in addition, such as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18884120172 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77657526862 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587982832618 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9187973073 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.9 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.7 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116666058557 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481031276989 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483618476818 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086823269791 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554507781397 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.