The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given map illustrates the alterations to the floor plan in two consecutive years 2009 and 2010.
Overall, there were plenty of radical changes in the layout, with the appearance of the refreshment and disappearance of the display area as well as the meeting room. It is also easily seen that some sections were relocated, enlarged and attached to new facilities.
As of 2009, the floor was designed with many zones within the entire area. There were two main entries in the north, with a registration office between them. In the middle of the plan was the display site directly facing the concert hall equipped with seating. Adjoining it was a small stage connecting to a meeting room. There was an area for exhibition right behind the display area. In the east was a long balcony.
One year later, the plan experienced a couple of radical modifications. The outside display area and the small meeting room were removed. The concert hall and the stage were combined then placed next to the balcony, which reduced the number of seats. The exhibition area was made bigger and moved to the former site for the concert hall. There was a new refreshment counter between the two entrances, so the registration office was relocated to be next to the concert hall. The balcony was attached to a newly-built lounge area. The only facilities left untouched were the main and side gates.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 251, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ony, which reduced the number of seats. The exhibition area was made bigger and mov...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84810126582 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61110192529 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502109704641 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2080638195 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.8125 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8125 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0725051882959 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0295119916118 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522290945221 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.071278118564 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772478511344 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.