The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.
Summaries the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two given maps illustrate the changes in Islip central town before and after improvement.
According to the plans, the town centre will be dramatically developed. It is clear to see that many facilities have been constructed while some building remains unchanged.
In reality, there is a main road sprawling from west to east, with also 2 more forks at each end of the town, one of them leads to the school and another one turns to the park. Both sides of the road include two ranges of shops, followed by the countryside in the north and housing areas in the south.
In the second map, a dual carriageway has been built to cover almost the central town, except the school and a residents area. The shops on the north have been demolished instead of car parking, bus stop, shopping centre and new housing, while the other shops have been preserved. The old road will be spent for pedestrians, and the park will be zoomed out for accommodation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'residents'' or 'resident's'?
Suggestion: residents'; resident's
...e central town, except the school and a residents area. The shops on the north have been ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66071428571 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54176424481 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636904761905 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4362355245 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.875 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127841404845 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569068080883 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465248849298 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771111063488 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272519370215 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.