The maps below show the changes that have been taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton a neighbouring town since 1962

The maps illustrate how changes have been made in Meadowside village and Fonton, which is a neighbouring town, over three different time periods (1962,1985 and the present).

Overall, Meadowside village has been expanded and has become Meadowside suburbs as it merged with Fonton. Furthermore, there have been significant changes made in infrastructure during the given periods.

In 1962, both Meadowside village and Fonton were completely separated from each other no roads or railways connecting them. Additionally, Fonton had a railway to the north, while Meadowside village only had a small road from the west.

In 1985, there was considerable developments in Meadowside village and Fonton. In Meadowside village, a small road was converted into the main road and was extended to the east to connect with Fonton. Meanwhile, Meadowside village was restructured with a new housing estate, superstore, and leisure complex.

Currently, both Meadowside, which is now a suburb and Fonton are joined. The railway line, which runs through Fonton, has been extended to the west where a train station has been built. To the north of the station, a hotel has been constructed, and to the south, the Business park has been located.

Votes
Average: 4.9 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the Business park has been located.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37113402062 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88880622453 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561855670103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.672733972 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.7272727273 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361502693863 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144437933282 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944059804177 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217581385362 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103299337609 0.0819641961636 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.