the maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.

The maps illustrate how an island has changed after construction of some tourist facilities and particular buildings. According to the maps, before these considerable developments the island did not have any fundamental equipment to tempt tourists for traveling there.
By passing the time, several considerable facilities is constructed there. Western and eastern parts of island were covered with woodland area. Actually, all developments occurred without any noticeable damage to the trees. In comparison with before, by construction of some swimming equipment people can swim there after developments. A reception building is built at the center of island which is connected with restaurant in northern part of island and a pier in south part of that by means of vehicle track. As you can see, two separated sets of huts are located in both sides of reception building to accommodate tourists in them during their traveling. These huts are connected to beach with footpath. The trees in western part of island has been surrounded with a set of huts.
Finally, these developments facilitate people`s accommodation in this island as a touristy and appropriate place.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 228, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
... any noticeable damage to the trees. In comparison with before, by construction of some sw...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 311, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: thereafter
...some swimming equipment people can swim there after developments. A reception building is b...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43715846995 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09068448989 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617486338798 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2654927302 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4545454545 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.90909090909 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25450783673 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910507321676 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111128152819 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181462076662 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135355972657 0.0819641961636 165% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.