The maps below show the layout of James Park in 2017 and the proposed changes to the park in 2027.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
James Park (2017): 5,000 monthly users
James Park Post-renovation (2027): 20,000 monthly users
The two maps show the changes in the layout of James Park after the renovation efforts in 2017 and 2027. Overall, the attractions in the park will be increased in size and number with the expectation of an increased number of visitors.
The new plan for the Park includes a larger Science Center along the upper side of the map, a gymnasium to the bottom left corner as well as a theater to the bottom right. To accommodate the new gym, the main playground will be reduced in size. The statue in the center of the park will be left unchanged while unlike before, the path around the park will extend all the way up to each of the attractions.
It is also worth noting that the park will only have one playground as the toddler playground will be converted into a theater. The fountain at the top right will be removed to make room for the garden and expansion of the Science center.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...after the renovation efforts in 2017 and 2027. Overall, the attractions in the p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 725.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42073170732 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38684271454 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1769145362 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.571428571 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229174999613 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120223016755 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132704205206 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16869777907 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102153196067 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.