Museums
The bar chart illustrates the popularity of three museums from the years 2000 to 2005.
In overall, the museums studied were visited by at least 6 million people annually, but their growth patterns vary. For instance, the MET attracted 12 million tourists in the year 2000, but their number halved the following year. Then a steady recovery started and initial numbers were reached in 2004. In 2005, MET was visited by more than 14 million people.
Edo’s Museum busiest years were the first two recorded, when it welcomed 13 million people annualy. Then, Edo faced a sharp decline in its popularity, marking its low at 6.1 million in 2003. Though, the museum started to recover its popularity, but it was 3 million short of its record. National Museum in Beijing demonstrated a steady increase in popularity during the entire timeframe by increasing its numbers from just above 6.1 million to 15 million in five years.
Generally speaking, it can be seen that the National museum in China has the biggest prospects of staying the most popular of the three.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'Museum the busiest'.
Suggestion: Museum the busiest
...ore than 14 million people. Edo's Museum busiest years were the first two recorded, when...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat the National museum in China has the biggest prospects of staying the most po...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, then, at least, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94972067039 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50780125463 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625698324022 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6065469812 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254116934827 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114970815524 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959535245862 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179868209174 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539870303876 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.