The number of International visitors going to Australia continues to grow, making the Australian government very aware of the importance of its tourism industry.
The chart below shows the spending pattern of these visitors while they are in Australia.
The charts compared the expenses of many tourists come to Australia between 1997 and 1999. Overall, there was an increase in wasting for both education fee and food, drink, and accommodation while the proportion of visitors for shopping saw a decrease over 3 years.
It can be seen from the graphs that the percentage of shopping, chosen by the number of international tourists saw a moderate fall in unusual, 24% and 23% and 20% respectively. Besides, this was the same as transport. 10% of the spending transport of these visitors before it grew slightly to 11% and kept this data in the next year.
On the other hand, food, drink, and accommodation was the most paying of these travellers before rising moderately each year, 34% and 37% and 39% respectively. This was the same as the education fee. Starting at 10% and then, it was a slight increase of 1% each year. Meanwhile, the proportion of organized tour saw a remain stable for 3 years, with 5%.
In conclusion, the amount spent in each category has not changed very over three years.
Comments
thank you!
thank you!
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e, the proportion of organized tour saw a remain stable for 3 years, with 5%. In conclu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, then, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75274725275 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73430465196 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60989010989 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.6301346903 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133398384358 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496744007699 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787881116615 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074730413544 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753083226129 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.