Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006, 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The information about Britain's who consumed daily preference proportion of fruit and vegetable in three periods is illustrated in a bar chart.
Overall, the figure for the group of women was by far more enthusiastic to consume fruit and vegetables, while the children's group witnessed the reverse. In any case, another counterpart showed some changes.
Initially, the percentage of female's group in the UK presented more popular eating fruit and vegetable, breaking the record as the highest proportion with a quarter. Furthermore, this trend was followed by males gender with just above a fifth, while for the rest of bracket saw only a minority percentage.
In 2006, the proportion of all groups saw the upward trends, with the women was still dominated to around 30%. Also, the men and the kids who ate these meals took up by 4% and 7% running. by 2010, all trends had decreased, with the youngest had accounted for considerably the lowest proportion to just approximately 15%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...ese meals took up by 4% and 7% running. by 2010, all trends had decreased, with th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, still, thus, while, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83907672544 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641975308642 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4271533337 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125293716882 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523356749506 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597106076337 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852268900735 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638315753863 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.