The picture below shows the difference in the layout of the conference center in 2010 and 2025 as proposed.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given map illustrates the distinction in the design of the center for conferences in 2010 and in the future year 2025.
Overall, there are some novel changes, with the appearance of the meeting rooms, eating and entertaining facilities, and the disappearance of one garden. It is also noticeable that there will be the relocation of the parking space.
In 2010, the conference center layout was quite simple. There was a reception area in the middle, together with a hall at the top. There were two room next to the hall. At the bottom of the layout stood a big garden; next to it was a long car park. There was also a garden the same length as the parking lot.
In 2025, the conference will experience massive changes. There will be a hall for residences comprising 20 rooms next to the original hall. The garden to the right of the parking area will be demolished, and the parking lot will be relocated to this space. The garden in the middle will be expanded in length, which will be pronounced. At the bottom, there will be necessary facilities, including an IT Center, eating house, a kitchen, game room and music room. There will also be 2 rooms for meeting in this complex. The components which will be left intact will be the previous rooms, reception zone and main hall.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 398, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...will be necessary facilities, including an IT Center, eating house, a kitchen, game r...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6288209607 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57060256733 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484716157205 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2170893369 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.6666666667 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2666666667 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.533333333333 5.23603664747 10% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0713261635091 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037152125623 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063649487275 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642729678818 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569868623704 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.98 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.