The picture illustrates the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps compare the major progress of the town at Shipsmouth from 1995 to 2010. Overall, it appears that Shipsmouth has become a much more modern and crowed city, with far more transport and leisure activities.
In the top of the left-hand side of the map, the forest has been cut down and replaced by apartment blocks while the factory near the lake has been converted into shopping centre. In the right-hand side of the map, the forest has been removed and transformed into the airport. One interesting change is that the twin houses near the church have been pulled down and skyscrapers have been built at that place.
However, the city centre in the middle of the map unchanged but the car road in it has been pedestrianized. Another disappearing thing is that the station below the city centre also has been remained throughout the years. Besides, an area between the factory and station was used for building a football stadium in 2010 whereas a station has been introduced in the top of the map which has the same size with the older one.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67204301075 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46356851868 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.968531378 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.625 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.06108955381 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290942712264 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403137625753 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0480392632806 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366765814047 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.