The data sources highlighted four main causes of land degradation globally and the proportion pattern in three different regions. Overall, deforestation, overgrazing and overcultivation accounts for the major reasons of less productive land and this displays unevenly in North America, Europe and Oceania.
Worldwide land degradation was attributed to the three causes mentioned above approximately at one third each, other reasons constituting a minimal 7% collectively.
However, regional land degradation reveals significant differences in causes. In Oceania, 13% land was degraded, 11% of which was caused by overgrazing. In contrast, shrinking forests resulted in 1.7% and there was no over farming problems in this region in 1990s. Severe land degradation happened in Europe, an alarming 23% land becoming less productive with all three causes contributing their share: deforestation the highest 9.8%, overcultivation 7.7% and overgrazing 5.5%.
Compared to Europe and Oceania, North America saw a much lower ration, 5% in total, over farming and over grazing made up over 95% causes, deforestation being a negligible 0.2%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...no over farming problems in this region in 1990s. Severe land degradation happened in Eu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8734939759 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22977533062 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668674698795 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9585921318 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.875 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270082184319 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12351171779 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688882743498 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153375614628 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955617534709 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.3012195122 131% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.4140731707 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.06136585366 126% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.