The pie chart below show the share of Oscar winners by film genre for 2003 and 2008.
The pie charts show the percentage of Oscar winners for seven different types of film in 2003 and 2008.
In general terms, In 2003 nd 2008, the proportion of flims that won Oscar changed for all the genres. Besides, the proportion of action films and thriller accounted highest percentage in this period.
As can be seen ftom the pie charts show that the percentage of thrillers that won Oscars dropped from about a half of the total in 2003 to nearly a third in 2008. The figures for horror flims also decreased a half from 2009 to 2008.
On the other hand, action, documentary and science fiction films all rose their share of Oscars between 2003 and 2008. Action films increased from about 20% in 2003 to arround 25% in 2008. The proportion of Oscar winners for documentaries, romance and science fiction all rose by approximately 15% between 2003 and 2008. In contrast, the percentage for comedy films which won Oscars stayed the same in 2003 and 2008 at about 5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 155, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'accounted the highest'.
Suggestion: accounted the highest
...proportion of action films and thriller accounted highest percentage in this period. As can be s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 200, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nted highest percentage in this period. As can be seen ftom the pie charts show th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, third, in contrast, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68421052632 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42181528796 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497076023392 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4023518861 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.480622567017 0.215688989381 223% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224354000251 0.103423049105 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137068094686 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335044457148 0.15604864568 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148114155054 0.0819641961636 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.