The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts illustrates major causes of land degradation in some period of 1990s. It depicts comparison where any of these reasons are exist.
Overall, the percentage of degraded territory by all causes in European countries outnumbered those other two regions by a significant margin. While both over-grazing and deforestation were relatively similar and continued being the main causes why agricultural land becomes less productive, much of the land degraded by over-grazing.
With regards to pie chart, whereas 35% of main reasons came from overgrazing, 30% of global causes of land degradation came from disboscation. For over-cultivation, the percentage was smaller, but also considerable - 28%.
The biggest percentage of land, that suffered from degradation, is in Europe, that reached approximately 23% due to the major problem of deforestation at 9,8% of all land; meanwhile, Oceania has 13% of total land degraded, mostly due to 11.3% of over-grazing in this country. Whilts other region have a lot of causes, North America do not have serious problems with ground suffering. The most essential cause of land degradation in large islands in the South Pacific is over-cultivation at close to 3.3%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...mparison where any of these reasons are exist. Overall, the percentage of d...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n where any of these reasons are exist. Overall, the percentage of degraded terr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s smaller, but also considerable - 28%. The biggest percentage of land, that suf...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5585106383 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27472623582 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664893617021 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7489609377 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.111111111 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197251498429 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791640168694 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622089361482 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128333084185 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443611080166 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.