The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the causes of worldwide land degradation which leads to less agricultural productions. As is shown, animals over-grazing is one of the main reasons with a 35 percent impact. Deforestation and over-cultivation almost play the same role in this disaster with the amount of respectively 30 and 28 percent. Other factors have a tiny fraction of this pie chart with only 7 percent.
The table shows the causes of land degradation by region. It can be seen from the table that the majority of land degradation happened in Europe (23%), while North America has the lowest total with only 5 percent of degraded land. Oceania has the second most degraded lands. It is clear from the table that over-grazing in Oceania(11.3%) is almost doubled compared with Europe(5.5%), and North America take the third place in this row with only 1.5%. Although deforestation in North America is near zero percent (0.2%), Europe has a large amount of it (9.8%) and Oceania is 1.7 percent. On the other hand, over-cultivation is zero in Oceania and the rate of this factor in Europe and North America is respectively 7.7 and 3.3 percent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89583333333 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93594817166 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520833333333 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2083325297 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119755359637 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691939532812 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926416577222 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103124758016 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290978265421 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.