The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparision where relevant.
The pie chart gives the most important reasons which were accounted for the global land degradation and the table describes the percentage of affected land by those causes in three regions America, Europe and Oceania during the 1990s.
Overall, three main reasons were overgrazing, cutting down forests, and over-cultivation and the region which had seriously destroyed land was Europe.
Regarding the pie chart, overgrazing was responsible for 35% of poor land productivity, followed by deforestation and exceeded agriculture, with the proportion 30% and 28% respectively. Along with those reasons, there was a small percentage of other causes took up 7%.
According to the data from the table, North America was the region which had the least negative effects from degradation, with 0.2% deforestation, 3.3% over-cultivation and 1.5% overgrazing. However, 23% of land in Europe -the largest data, explained for 9.8% destroyed forest, 7.7% improper growing, and 5.5% over-farming. In the Oceania region, there was 13% of total land degraded, and over-grazing contributed to 11.3%, whereas no impact of over-cultivation in this area.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '-the the largest'.
Suggestion: -the the largest
...grazing. However, 23% of land in Europe -the largest data, explained for 9.8% destroyed fore...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, regarding, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61046511628 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21878339166 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639534883721 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7975035748 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.857142857 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168672638428 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785799073169 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764832575574 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120476497358 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784230737162 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.