The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The charts show the percentage of agricultural land damage on various reasons in worldwide, and also three main regions, including North America, Europe, and Oceania, during the 1990s.
Looking firstly at worldwide statistical pie chart, we see that the highest area of land degradation is over-grazing, at 35%. It is followed closely by deforestation which is 5% and less than overgrazing, followed by over-cultivation at 28%. All other minor reasons are mentioned as ‘other’ and constituted 7% loss of land fertility.
Regarding three agricultural regions, we see that at deforestation is the main land destroyed factor in Europe (9.8%), and reaching it to the worst in comparison with other regions. However, in North America and the Oceania, farmlands were impacted by others main reasons, over-cultivation (3.3%) and over-grazing (11.3%) respectively. Interestingly, over-cultivation had no effect on Australia, New Zealand, and islands in the South Pacific.
In conclusion, in 1990, Europe faced the problem of land degradation. The main cause behind it was deforestation, while it was considered as the second impact in worldwide analysis.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, regarding, second, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53946476282 2.65546596893 133% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632183908046 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4655109809 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.555555556 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199937221614 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747081451197 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820813022539 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130967364694 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943925909016 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.