The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Given is the pie chart illustrating what the factors affected negatively to worldwide land and the table described land degradation in three regions by these causes mentioned in the 1990s.
It is clear from the chart that the degradation in land spent the most on over-grazing. While, the table shows that Europe was the region receiveiving the most percentage in agricultural land, in comparison with the category in the North America was given the least expenditure.
For the rate of over-grazing was highest, at 35%, while, the figure for deforestation was significantly lower, at 30%. The percentage of over-cultivation researched during the 1990s accounted for 28% of the total group. Meanwhile, 7% was the lowest number came from the other causes.
The proportion of land degraded by over-grazing was the highest in Oceania, at 11,3%, while, over-cultivation had zero impact in this area. In terms of deforestation, the percentage of expenditure on this category in the Europe was higher than other regions, at 9,8%. By contrast, spending on this item in North America made up the smallest proportion, at 0,2% of the total spending in this area.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2192513369 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16151794947 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540106951872 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9165796798 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.444444444 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160724675531 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695792779951 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989948254281 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129395382586 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121784355167 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.