The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the1990s.
The chart illustrates primary causes that lead to a decrease in productivity of soil. The table compares three different areas of the world in terms of three reasons of one degradation over the 1990s.
Overall, It is clear that over-grazing made up a largest proportion of causes of soil degradation. During the 1990s, Europe witnessed a highest figure in total land degraded.
In of all reasons, over-grazing accounted for 35%, which was fivefold other. The lower number was 30% for deforestation, compared with 28% for over-cultivation.
During the 1990s, total land degraded in Europe was highest, with 25%, compared to 13% and 5% in Oceania and North America, respectively. In Europe, deforestation was principal cause that resulted less productive agricultural land, with 9.8%, compared with only 0.2% in North America and 1.7% in Oceania. In contrast, over-grazing accounted for 11,3% in land degradation in Oceania, compared with 1.5% in North America. Over-cultivation has no effect on soil in Oceania, while it was reason of 3% and 7.7% of land degradation in North America and Europe, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 48, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
..., It is clear that over-grazing made up a largest proportion of causes of soil de...
^
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ion. During the 1990s, Europe witnessed a highest figure in total land degraded. ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31818181818 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21024235716 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3618181274 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121222255605 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577546096512 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451089156735 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829147908085 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622538314542 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.