The pie chart shows four reasons of the land degradation and the table gives the percentages of different reasons of land degradation in three different parts of the world in 1990.
Overall, according to pie chart,over grazing was the major cause of land degradation in 1990. And table shows Europe affected most from land degradation comparing to other regions.
As per pie chart the largest proportion of land degraded due to over grazing (35%), and this follows deforestation with 30% and over cultivation with 28%. Other factors accounted only 7% of the total land degradation.
When look at table, Europe affected more land degradation comparing to other regions, 23%. Out of this, 9.8% Of land here affected from deforestation, 7.7% accounted for over cultivation and 5.5% due to over grazing. 13% of Ocena land went less productive and the major reason in this region was over grazing 11.3%. Finally North america was least experienced land degradation only 5% in total and the major factor of less productive land here was over cultivation with 3.3%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , over
...990. Overall, according to pie chart,over grazing was the major cause of land de...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...all, according to pie chart,over grazing was the major cause of land degradation ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...egradation comparing to other regions. As per pie chart the largest proportion ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...only 7% of the total land degradation. When look at table, Europe affected more...
^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d here affected from deforestation, 7.7% accounted for over cultivation and 5.5% ...
^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... due to over grazing. 13% of Ocena land went less productive and the major reaso...
^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... in this region was over grazing 11.3%. Finally North america was least experienced lan...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11494252874 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74534641509 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4228424335 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8888888889 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188973293338 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938686074069 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611212445158 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144376098353 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657594201908 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.