The chart gives information about why the quality of farmland becomes poor, with the table reveals the proportion of three areas affected by the mentioned issues during the 1990s.
Looking more closely at the pie chart, it is apparent that the over-grazing and destruction of trees were the dominant reasons for the degraded land, a total of 65% of degradation was caused by these issues during the 1990s. Excessive cultivated activities, meanwhile, cited as reasons for 28%, and the other unspecific reasons accounted for the remaining 7%.
According to the table, Europe was suffered most, with the highest overall percentage of degraded land. In particular, near 10% of land was due to the deforestation, while the influences of this on North America and Oceania were less significant. In Oceania, the majority of land degraded due to over-gazing. By stark contrast, North American had the lowest proportion of degraded land at only 5%, and the principal cause was over-cultivation.
Overall, it is clear that over-grazing, deforestation and over-cultivation were the main reasons for the land degradation. In addition, among three areas in the table, Europe suffered more from the land degradation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while, in addition, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38947368421 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11790468743 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584210526316 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1688191369 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.777777778 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199806843096 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791564196241 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598276606607 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129262197912 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548245873527 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.