The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart and table describe how land throughout the world was degradation during the 1990s, on the worldwide scale and the latter in three different regions.
Generally, land degradation was due to three main elements and these factors altered proportion in various areas.
On the global scale, over-grazing was the biggest cause of land degradation with 35% and following it was deforestation with 30%, over-cultivation causing slight less with 28%. Other factors caused 7%.
Besides, the table shows that, during the 1990s, the total percentage of land degradation in Europe was 23%, Oceania in the second position with 13% and far more than in North America with 5%. In Oceania, over-grazing was the best reason for land degradation (11,3%), with deforestation accounting for far less (1.3%) and none caused by over-cultivation. In Europe, deforestation was responsible for 9.8% of land degradation, over-cultivation with 7.7% and over-grazing with 5.3%. In North America, over-cultivation was the main reason for land degradation (3.3%), less causing was over-grazing with 1.5% and very little being caused by deforestation with 0,2%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 477, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n with 7.7% and over-grazing with 5.3%. In North America, over-cultivation was the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48295454545 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26616588951 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528409090909 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7701622511 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.625 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178156325611 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102041802934 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594866431275 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138455738638 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559848437303 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.