The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given pie charts depict the income and outgoing source over a year of the children charity situated in USA.

Overall, the donated food was the main source of revenue, whereas, most expenditures were made on program services. The total revenue sources exceed expenditures.

To begin with, donated food was the main source of income for children charity in USA, by 86.6% and program services were the highest outgoing category for children charity, accounted 95.8%.

Similarly, regards with income sources, others contributed in tiny portion. Where community contributions by 10.4% and it was followed by program revenue by 2.2%. Moreover, investment income, government grants and other income were accounted 0.2%, o.2% and o.4% respectively. However, there are only two sources of expenditures besides program services, which were in smaller proportion in comparison. Fundraising and management and general was recorded only 2.6% and 1.6% respectively. The total amount of revenue was $53,561,580, which is enough to cover overall expenditures of $53,224,896.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (2 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, moreover, similarly, so, whereas, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7125 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84868390665 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61875 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0560674506 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115016097175 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443471018107 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631516288415 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939414895737 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741420886352 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.