The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the ratio of income and expenditures pattern of children’s charity situated in USA throughout the year.
Overall, as shown in the pie chart, donated food was the main source of revenue, whereas most expenditures were made on program services.
To begin with, the main income source of children’s charity was donated food, which cover three third of income. It was recorded 86.6% and program services was the highest expenditure source, with 95.8%.
Similarly, regards to the revenue sources, the contributions of other sources were in tiny portion. community contribution was second highest revencue source and it was recorded only 10.4%, while it was followed by program revenue ith 2.2%. Moreover, investment income and government grants are identical at 0.2% and other income source cover 0.4%. However, beside program services there are only two major expenditures sources of children's charity, fund raising and management and general. They are recorded 2.6% and 1.6% respectively. However, total revenue exceed the total expenditure and children’s charity is capable to save some for the organization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...s made in program services, with 95.8%. furthermore, fund raising and management and genera...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, moreover, similarly, so, third, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52795031056 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94218560856 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55900621118 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.9615501544 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.8888888889 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159053382257 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783844121328 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890439285913 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13584508979 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098440189221 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.