The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the ratio of income and expenditures pattern of children’s charity situated in USA throughout the year.
Overall, as shown in the pie chart, donated food was the main source of revenue, whereas most expenditures were made on program services.
To begin with, the main income source of children’s charity was donated food, which cover three third of income. It was recorded 86.6% and program services was the highest expenditure source, with 95.8%.
Similarly, regards to the revenue sources, the contributions of other sources were in tiny portion. community contribution was second highest revenue source and it was recorded only 10.4%, while it was followed by program revenue with 2.2%. Moreover, investment income and government grants are identical at 0.2% and other income source cover 0.4%. However, beside program services there are only two major expenditures sources of children's charity, fund raising and management and general. They are recorded 2.6% and 1.6% respectively. However, total revenue exceeds the total expenditure and children’s charity is capable to save some for the organization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Community
... of other sources were in tiny portion. community contribution was second highest revenue...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, second, similarly, so, third, whereas, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61494252874 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82160497191 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1035584935 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0980869210805 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046111201954 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636691030919 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939300004782 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689404044004 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.