The pie charts and table give information about the total value sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000.
The given table illustrates the value of fish that was imported to the Unite States in the billions of dollars scale, while the three pie charts show that the percentage of three different types which are export countries to sell fish from 1988 to 2000.
Overall, it is immediately clear that the value of import increasingly rose almost double in the research period. At the initial research, Canada was predominant regarding exporting fish whereas other countries overtook the amount of fish, by the final year.
When it comes to the table, it can be seen that there was a $1.95 billion growth between 1988 and 1992. Finally, it reached over $10 billion in the last year.
Looking at the pie charts, the ratio of fish imported to the US accounted for over half in Canada, this percent was higher than the others types combined. However, the other countries occupied 42 percent, became the main source compare with China and Canada which provide 30 and 28 percent respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the value of fish that was imported to the Unite States in the billions of dollars scale...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al year. When it comes to the table, it can be seen that there was a .95 bill...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89221556886 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43060670877 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640718562874 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2388479469 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.714285714 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243745253504 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924258082911 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786524609467 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131856690305 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765796844641 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.