The pie charts and the table show the types of living accommodation occupied by 25-year-olds in London during yhr 1990s and 2010s and the availability of different types of accommodation in London during the same two periods.
The pie charts compare the survey of 25 years old accommodation in London and the table show the availability of different kinds of housing in London in 1990 and 2010.
In general terms, shared accommodation has become the most common from if housing for this age group in the 1990s and 2010s. however, the number of available 1-2 bedroom houses and falts has reduced the housing choices for this age group during the same periods.
It is clear from the charts show that in the 1990s, only about 50% of those surveyed lived in shared house or flats. Nevertheless, this number has grown to around 75% in the 2010s. In contrast, there was a drop in the number of people living alone in alone house and flat from about 25% to nearly 5% from 1990 to 2010. In addition, living with parents hs become less common. There was a reduction in the number of 25-year-olds living with parents from approximately a third to under a quarter in this periods.
On the other hand, the reduction in the availability of 1-2 bedroom houses and flats has altered this figure. In the 1990s, there were 34000 1-2 bedroom houses and 32000 1-2 bedroom flats availbale. These figure decreased to 12000 and 10000 respectively in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... this age group in the 1990s and 2010s. however, the number of available 1-2 bedroom ho...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...oximately a third to under a quarter in this periods. On the other hand, the reduct...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, third, in addition, in contrast, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68075117371 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47834857159 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507042253521 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9242391376 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6363636364 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25407147275 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938878257813 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111873153819 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179270993663 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146837303752 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.