The pie chart compares seven different household expenses in two different years 1950 and 2010 in some country.
Overall, the money spent for housing was too high in 1950, and other expenditures had insignificant proportions. However in 2010 the money spent for housing went down dramatically, while the expenditure on other things increased significantly.
In 1950, the people in some country had spent nearly three quarter of their total household expenditure on housing. This follows food with 11.2% and education, 6.6%. All the other expenses had insignificant proportions during this year.
After 6 decades in 2010 , the peoples spending habit on household things changed tremendously. The expenditure on housing decreased significantly by almost 50% Whereas, the other expenditures went up. The money spent on food saw almost a three fold increase. Similarly, the expenses on transport and other items also increased by almost 11% and 14% respectively. Interestingly, there is no significant changes in the expenditure of education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t years 1950 and 2010 in some country. Overall, the money spent for housing wa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2010 in some country. Overall, the money spent for housing was too high...
^^
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...nditures had insignificant proportions. However in 2010 the money spent for housing wen...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pent for housing went down dramatically, while the expenditure on other things i...
^^
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...using went down dramatically, while the expenditure on other things increased si...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ficant proportions during this year. After 6 decades in 2010 , the peoples sp...
^^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...this year. After 6 decades in 2010 , the peoples spending habit on household...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, whereas, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61392405063 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17984087635 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594936708861 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0974958416 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.6363636364 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3636363636 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16942762122 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627351786225 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574088437472 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112686233023 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488658566901 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.