The two charts illustrate production of electricity as a percentage using different sources of fuel in France between 1995 and 2005.
Overall, coal was the major power house both in 1995 and 2005. In 1995 unmentioned sources contributed the least as well as in 2005. Nuclear was also among the least contributer in both years, while gas was the average producer.
Energy production by coal was the major with 29.80 percent and 30.93 percent in 1995 and 2005 respectively. Gas also produced enormous power slightly below coal at 29.63 and 30.31 percent in 1995 and 2005 respectively. It can clearly be seen that petrol contributed 29.27 percent in 1995, while in 2005 it was the average producer, at 19.55 percent. Nuclear accounted for 6.4 percent of energy, whilst others, at 4.90 percent in 1995. In 2005, nuclear contributed one tenth of energy, whereas other unmentioned sources of energy produced 9.10 percent.
To sumup, there was a slight difference in percentage of coal and gas in both 2005 and 1995. Other sources almost doubled in 2005 from 1995. There was a reduction in the use of petrol in 2005, as nuclear and others increased the production of power in 2005. It is also of note that there was a slight increase in the contribution made by gas and coal in 2005.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84545454545 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61323712366 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445454545455 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8503211556 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.0 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9230769231 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0861195935313 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403711911207 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629891441916 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862981847864 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899685138797 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.