The pie chart illustrates the amount of power generated in New Zealand and Germany using 5 different fuel sources. The figures are given for the years 1980 and 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that the total electricity production increased dramatically in both the countries. Although the totals for both the countries were almost similar there were big differences in the fuel sources used.
To begin, coal was used to produce 56 of the total 127 units of electricity in New Zealand in 1980, which rose to 150 out of 200 units In 2010. By contrast Nuclear power became the most important fuel source in Germany, producing almost 75% of the country's electricity.
Hydropower usage increased from 30 to 46 units in New Zealand during the period, but the amount of electricity produced using this type of power fell fro. 7 to only 2 units in Germany. Pertroleuam on the other hand remained a relatively important power source in Germany but its use declined in New Zealand(11 to only 2 units). Both the countries relied on natural gases for electricity production significantly more in 1980 than in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... To begin, coal was used to produce 56 of the total 127 units of electricity in...
^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the total 127 units of electricity in New Zealand in 1980, which rose to 150 o...
^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
... produced using this type of power fell fro. 7 to only 2 units in Germany. Pertrole...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90957446809 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74044597422 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590425531915 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0590330933 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312014000879 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113495051418 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877903433305 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199938309188 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111712902921 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.