The pie charts below show the main regions that received exports from 3 Latin America countries in 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The provided pie charts compare 3 nations, namely Argentina, Chile and Mexico, in terms of the markets they maintained trade exchange in 2004.
Generally, exports from 3 surveyed countries were witnessed in all 4 regions. However, there were differences in the major markets of each individual counterpart.
Turning into detail, occupying 36%, remaining Latin American nations were the most prevalent export destination in Chile, followed by a nearly-one-fourth proportion of Europe. Unlike the aforementioned country, in comparison to other regions, which accounted for 41% of Argentine exported goods, the figure for other Latin American territories was significantly lower, with 31%. Nevertheless, with 10% and 19%, respectively, America was the least common target for products from both Argentina and Chile.
Regarding to Mexico, despite exporting to all surveyed areas, unbalanced distribution among them was easily observed in its rates. Specifically, 87% of total Mexican products were exported to the USA, ranking first among 4 sectors, while the figure for other Latin American countries was only 2%. Meanwhile, Europe and other regions had similar percentages, with 6% and 5%, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...markets of each individual counterpart. Turning into detail, occupying 36%, rema...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81460674157 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10905698305 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691011235955 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9383758506 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133479988898 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542935308333 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313975452975 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079272108999 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00494285088804 0.0819641961636 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.4140731707 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.88 8.06136585366 135% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.