The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The information about units of electricity production by different fuel sources in two countries between 1980 and 2000 is illustrated in pie charts.
Overall, the figure for Coal sources in Australia saw more popular, and increase over the years. However, in France, a Nuclear power source was more preferred for electricity compared to other figures.
In Australia, the number of Coal sources for electricity was most common in the first period with 50 units, followed by Hydropower and Natural source with the same number of 20 units. Meanwhile, the rest of the sources saw a minority number. By 2000, the number of Coal sources had a significant increase to 130 units, as well as the units for Hydropower. On the other hand, other figures showed some changes in downward trends
When it came to France, the number of Nuclear sources was more preferred, breaking the record as the highest number in the last period to just above 125 units. also, the figures for coal and natural gas sources were the same numbers, but the source of coal remained stable until the last period. Nevertheless, for the two rest of source saw a dramatic decrease to 2 units.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s showed some changes in downward trends When it came to France, the number of Nu...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...he last period to just above 125 units. also, the figures for coal and natural gas s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90862944162 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58208536515 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522842639594 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1645071142 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.444444444 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1111111111 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170322732781 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874535041911 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812970853703 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140742133562 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100655627138 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.