The two pie charts compare how people in Canada and Australia keep track of news.
Canadians primarily get information through TV and online. The largest percentage of Canadians is recorded in those watching the news on TV, at 40%, followed closely by those reading news online, at 36%. In Australia, these types of accessing news are also most preferred. However, online passes over TV, with over half of Australians read news online, which is 15% higher than those watching the news on TV.
The three rest of methods: Print, radio and not specified are minor methods. The total percentage of Canadian people using these ways is double this figure in Australia, at 24%. People getting news through the paper in Canada is 14%, twice higher than the proportion of those in Australia. Similarly, those listening to the news on the radio account for 7% of Canadians, while this figure in Australia is 2%.
Overall, TV and online are the most popular methods of keeping track of news in Australia and Canada, with a smaller percentage of people using minor methods are seen in Australia.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stralians read news online, which is 15% higher than those watching the news on T...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91847826087 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49578448937 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4466733736 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200335580489 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934536967912 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722330147605 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151343092374 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722424535471 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.