The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.

The various reasons for migration from and to the UK are shown by the pie chart.

Overall, it is clear from the chart that nearly a third of migrants came to the UK in search of a definite job. Additionally, slightly below the fraction of people immigrated to the UK emigrated from the UK to find a definite job, in 2007.

The majority of people who immigrated to the UK were looking for a definite job. Furthermore, many students also entered the UK for their studies as equal to just above a quarter. There were also a significant fraction of people migrated for accompany.

The most noticeable thing from the emigration data is that the majority of residents of the UK left it to find a definite job. While just under a quarter of people migrated to other countries to get a job. Finally, there was no reason stated by lots of people for emigration.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the UK left it to find a definite job. While just under a quarter of people migrated...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple migrated to other countries to get a job. Finally, there was no reason stated...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, look, so, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 715.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61290322581 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66241422993 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.4533660198 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.4444444444 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365505027126 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171963528951 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151841166039 0.0843802449381 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285609831336 0.15604864568 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176661031393 0.0819641961636 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.