The pie graphs compare information about the percentage of four groups online sales in Canada in 2005 and 2010.
Overall, it is obvious from the data that video games and food and beverage had upward trend while the other two groups had downward trend.
In 2005, electronics and appliance were the most selling group and the proportion of online sales was 35% whereas the most popular sales in 2010 was food and beverage which had 32% of selling. For the lowest online sales group, there was a change as well. Video games was the least selling group in 2005. There was 18% of shopping sales proportion but it was the third in 2010 and home furnishings became the lowest instead.
The rank of selling groups between 2005 and 2010 had changed from electronics and appliance, home furnishings, food and beverage and video games to food and beverage, electronics and appliance, video games and home furnishings respectively. Home furnishings and food and beverage were the same changes by 10%. There was a decrease in home furnishings from 25% to 15% and an increase in food and beverage from 22% to 32%. For the other groups, there was the same 5% changes as well. Video games and electronics and appliances were rise to 23% and drop to 30% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
... games and food and beverage had upward trend while the other two groups had downward...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...while the other two groups had downward trend. In 2005, electronics and appliance ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 531, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...mes and electronics and appliances were rise to 23% and drop to 30% respectively.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, third, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 6.8 324% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81105990783 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52732103437 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442396313364 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.6718843814 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9090909091 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175863507146 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086547502327 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965827047955 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140365941875 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128099920994 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.