Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day.
The given figures provide a comparison of the healthcare institution in 2005 and this refurbishment in the present day.
By comparing the 2005 and present-day health center plans, specific alterations are noteworthy. From an overall perspective, it is apparent that there is an expansion in land and dramatic change in service positions.
Taking a first look at the image in 2005, it is obvious that there are merely 3 consulting rooms which locate on both sides of the healthcare institution and one office above consulting room 3 on the left side. Subsequently, there is a reception desk in the central area once walking through the entrance of the building. Following that, on the top to the right of the building is the physiotherapy room and the capacity for car parking is 12 spaces.
Moving to the plan in the present day, the entrance is moved to the left side. Upon entering this entrance, it is the advent of the reception desk and children's areas. The office and physiotherapy room are still in the same location while there is some change in the office's shape. Moreover, the seats are moved to the right side and there are now 4 consulting rooms in this area. Finally, there are the new existence of a minor operations room and car parking at the present day can contain 30 spaces for the clients.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 430, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'operations'' or 'operation's'?
Suggestion: operations'; operation's
... there are the new existence of a minor operations room and car parking at the present day...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, moreover, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7850877193 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76307087025 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6393119101 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1818181818 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144108508954 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579951663529 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733681268376 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948818467491 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451236342658 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.