The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The presented maps illustrate how Grange Park, which is located between Arnold Avenue and Eldon Street, has changed since 1920 when it was opened for visitors.

Overall, the basic structure of the park remained the same with a few changes. Few things were relocated and some new features were introduced.

In 1920, the park had a stage for musicians on the west side which is replaced by an amphitheatre for concerts. The fountain located at the centre of park is replaced by a rose garden. There were three rose gardens and five seats across the park in 1920. But today only rose garden on the north west corner and one at middle are present. All the seats located in the middle of park in the current layout around the new rose garden.

The glasshouse on the south east side of the park has been replaced by a water feature. The children's play area and a cafe has been introduced in place of pond for water plants and rose garden on the north east. The two entrances to the park remain the same with addition of a new entrance for underground car park.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ants and rose garden on the north east. The two entrances to the park remain the sa...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54166666667 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28436336256 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557291666667 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7828735211 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2727272727 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4545454545 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 5.23603664747 12% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188918592968 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791426530104 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426671953864 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115116471237 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122162525711 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.