The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words.
The given map plan outlines the comparison of a public park of 1 century: 1920 and today after the succession of reconstruction of park with modern facilities.
In details, in 1920, when park was built there was two main entrance: Arnold avenue and Eldon street still remained unchanged. However, the old stage for musician was replaced with modern building and with big area in the same place with the name of Amphitheater for concert. Similarly, the fountain is replaced by beautiful rose garden surrounded with seating facilities for visitors. In the same time frame, rose garden has been decreased from 3 to 2.
Furthermore, water pond now is has been changed to modern beautiful pond in the opposite of old place replacing glasshouse. Additionally, three new facilities are added in modern park, the café next to the Arnold entrance by replacing one rose garden and children’s play area in the place of old pond. As well as, in the right corner of Eldon street, basement car park entrance was constructed for the parking facilities.
Overall, as compared to old and new public park, some facilities are at the same place with no any changes and some are reconstructed with modern facilities, while some facilities are removed by added new facilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 93, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...e facilities are at the same place with no any changes and some are reconstructed ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, still, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05714285714 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80808679957 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8224097256 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150878832428 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070969766213 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725555627652 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117255685135 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715113461266 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.