The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The first picture illustrates the park in its opening in 1920 and the second one describes the public park after the development these days.
Overall, it is clear that Grange Park experienced several changes in terms of facilities and infrastructure. Besides, the plans were the emergence of water features and the disappearance of the fountain.
In 1920, the park was built two entrances in which are located in Arnold and Eldon Street near the stages for musicians. In the middle of the picture, the fountain was constructed. There were lots of seats and a rose garden around the surrounding. Pond for water plants was erected in the Northeast.
In recent years, the fountain is demolished to the replacement of the rose garden together with four seats on both four sides. Amphitheatre for concerts appears to replace the stage for musicians. There is the appearance of a cafe in the north. Seats in the west are destroyed to make the pave for the entrance underground car park. In addition, a pond for water plants and a glasshouse are changed by the water feature for entertainment purposes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 285, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...Seats in the west are destroyed to make the pave for the entrance underground car park. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rance underground car park. In addition, a pond for water plants and a glasshouse...
^^
Line 4, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter feature for entertainment purposes.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, second, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95135135135 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85830968556 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562162162162 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3008067366 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.3333333333 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4166666667 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.91666666667 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151795057018 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511625816019 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697000118891 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112959282831 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777476462386 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.