The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The illustrations show two maps, a Grange park in 1920 and a park in the present.
So far, the two access gates in the middle have remained unchanged. Additionally, the rose garden to the left has been maintained.
However, there are several major differences, the most significant of which is that the fountain in the centre is replaced with a rose garden consists of four surrounding seats. In addition to two main entrances, there is an extra entry underground car park. The glasshouse and seats in the south-east of the park were demolished and develop a water feature . To the northeast, they removed the rose garden and replaced it with a café. Pond for water plants converted into a children's play area. Besides, all everything in the south-west and the corner of the park were knocked down. A stage for musicians to the west was renovated into an amphitheatre for concerts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e demolished and develop a water feature . To the northeast, they removed the rose...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 737.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88079470199 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86158498542 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615894039735 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.107475765 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.7 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131590752151 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521612073586 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748501280608 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107068100852 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963499233122 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.