The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the samepark today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the samepark today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The plans provide us information about Grange park when is was opened in 1920, and the way it has changed until now.

Overall, as it is obvious from maps, the park has been expanded with more amenities in number and size. Also it changed its look from a traditional park to a more contemporary one with modern facilities.

To begin with, it had a rose garden in the north-west of the park, but the number of rose gardens has increased to three in east and south corner of the park, and instead of a rose garden in the north-east a new café has been erected. The fountain in center of the park has been replaced by a rose garden. Also, in the past there were five seats in all locating in each side of the Grange, whereas they all have been demolished and centralized in the middle around the rose garden. Following by, stage for musicians in the west is developed to an amphitheatre for concerts, and a new entrance underground car park is been considered in the left side of the park. Finally, pond for water plants and glasshouse are destroyed and in their place a new children’s area and water feature have been built.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: VBZ_VBD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...e us information about Grange park when is was opened in 1920, and the way it has ...
^^
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...s information about Grange park when is was opened in 1920, and the way it has chan...
^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...with more amenities in number and size. Also it changed its look from a traditional ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 730, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ants and glasshouse are destroyed and in their place a new children’s area and wa...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, look, so, whereas, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52657195431 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558252427184 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4702882892 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.875 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103859544268 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052700896125 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594935166641 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987254530172 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760557862336 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.