The pictures illustrate the changes to Grange Park from 1920 to the present.
Looking at the plans, it can be immediately seen that this public park has undergone remarkable changes with the most noticeable being the disappearance of fountain and the addition of essential utilities such as cafe, playground and car park.
To begin with, it is clear that two entrance to the park in Eldon street and Arnold street remain unchanged after a long period. Nearly that, the fountain in the center of Grange park has been demolished. When the park first opened in 1920, a stage was built for performances of musicians to the west of the park which has been upgraded into a large Amphitheater to adjust the demand of concerts. At the same time, old rose gardens, except the one in the north west of the park, has been merged into a square one in the center which is surrounding by removed seats for audiences to enjoy concerts.
On the other side, a water feature has been set up in the east-south to replace for glasshouse, near a new entrance to underground car park. In addition, in the right top corner of the map, a children's play area which is next door to a cafe have been established in the same position with a pond for water plants in the first day.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 599, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... seats for audiences to enjoy concerts. On the other side, a water feature has b...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, so, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55752212389 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56446373997 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566371681416 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.806139633 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.75 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206764703448 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933858353191 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475806868631 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120555926507 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034230365548 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.