The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two plans illustrate how the Grange park has changed from 1920 to today.
Overall, the main difference is the appearance of new facilities involving entertainment. However, there have been some basic elements of flowers, seating and music retained.
When the park first opened in 1920, it had two entrances in Eldon street and Arnold avenue. In the middle of the park, a fountain was constructed. On the right of the fountain, there was a rose garden and a pond for water plants to the north. On the opposite side, a glasshouse was established, and seats for tourists were not far from it. There were four other seating areas on the left of the fountain with a stage for musicians in the center. Besides, the park had two rose gardens, the first was situated to the north, while the other one was sited at the opposite direction.
Nowadays, Grange park still has two entrances to get in it, but there is a third entry gate where people can access from the underground car park. In the center, the fountain has been replaced by a large rose garden with a seating area on each side of it. On the right, the old rose garden and the pond have been removed to build a cafe and a children's play area. Moreover, the glasshouse has been demolished to make room for a water feature. Another change has been the destruction of the seating areas on the left of the rose garden. Besides, the stage has become a large amphitheater for concerts and a rose garden has been pulled down.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e was sited at the opposite direction. Nowadays, Grange park still has two entr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6015037594 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47407268929 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503759398496 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 374.4 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.5526229391 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.6 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137340477539 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529459287023 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729605346054 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986627802009 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653412508881 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.