The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given diagram below illustrates the changes of an airport before and after the refurbishment which will occur in the next year. From the general perspective, it is apparent that Southwest airport is planned to be enlarged.
Looking at the details, this airport will witness some additional facilities, which are hoped to provide guests more convenient services. For example, more gates would be arranged in both departures and arrivals sections. Moreover, a number of recreational utilities are going to be set up to serve the demand of visitors, such as an ATM and car-hire service are organized in the arrivals department, and the number of cafes will be increased, from solely one in the departures to two stores in both sections.
On the other hand, there are still some facilities that will be remained after the renovation. For instance, both security passport control and passport control customs officials are organized to stay at the same place as they do now. Besides, there will be a bag drop section placed in front of the security control department, and the check-in counter is arranged to move left after the redevelopment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'diagrams'.
Suggestion: diagrams
The given diagram below illustrates the changes of an air...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 380, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arrivals'' or 'arrival's'?
Suggestion: arrivals'; arrival's
...d car-hire service are organized in the arrivals department, and the number of cafes wil...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, look, moreover, so, still, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09042553191 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82664098811 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585106382979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1799344148 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.625 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151010397594 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706353932122 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656728628337 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118241987946 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751044259783 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.